Past Forward: Get the Key to Your Future

About Vaccine Propaganda: From Published Sources

False Placebos: Faking Vaccine Safety Tests
Herd Immunity: Lie of Community Immunity
Original Herd Immunity: Unrelated to Vaccination
New Herd Immunity: Getting Guilt Tripped
Illogical Herd Immunity: Do Vaccines Work or NOT?
Coercive Herd Immunity: 95% Mandatory Compliance?
Boosting + Herd Immunity: Children Boosting Adults?
Vaccine Hesistancy: Cured by Mandates?
One Size Fits All?: Unethical + Unfair
10,000 Vaccines: Are You Kidding Me?
Immune Overload Theory: Too Many Vaxxes, Too Soon
Vaccine Mystery: Vaccines = Black Boxes
Group Think: Applying Social Pressure
Four Dog Defense: Tobacco Industry Tactics
Fear Appeal: Getting Fear Tripped
Obstacles to Knowledge: Falling Into Mental Traps
Disease Die Off: False Credit to Vaccination
Always Anti-Vaxxers: Vaccination Always Protested
Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed Study: Unvaxxed = More Healthy
Intellectual Dishonesty: American Pediatric Censorship
Doctor Herd Mentality: Spectacular Medical Fails
Vaccine Fanaticism: Crucifying Vaccine Heretics

Why are vaccines tested without using saline or sugar as the placebo?

False placebos are the "old vaccines... experimental vaccines... dangerous adjuvants which we know cause neurotoxicity and death". False placebos are used because: "when you test one poison against another poison, you do not have a measureable outcome." Drug companies use false placebos to prove their "product is safe [they] have to show that the death rate (mortality) and rate of illness (morbidity) is similar to the mortality and the morbidity that is already out there." Toni Bark MD ("Vaccines Revealed")

What is the present theory of herd immunity?

I will let the explain: "Community Immunity ('Herd Immunity') (supposedly means that) vaccines can prevent outbreaks of disease and save lives. When a critical portion of a community is immunized against a contagious disease, most members of the community are protected against that disease because there is little opportunity for an outbreak. Even those who are not eligible for certain vaccines — such as infants, pregnant women, or immunocompromised individuals — get some protection because the spread of contagious disease is contained. This... applies to control of a variety of contagious diseases, including influenza, measles, mumps, rotavirus, and pneumococcal disease."

What is the origin of herd immunity?

"The term, 'herd immunity', was coined by researcher, A. W. Hedrich, after he had studied the epidemiology of measles in USA between 1900-1931. His study published in the May, 1933 American Journal of Epidemiology concluded that when 68% of children younger than 15 yrs old had become immune to measles via infection, measles epidemics ceased." Two things about this. One, this was an observation about a population of UN-vaccinated children. Two, another explanation for this is that by the 68% mark, that particular wave of illness was dying down anyway!

What is the 'new' herd immunity?

This is the best explanation of the "new" Herd Immunity that I have ever read: Is it truly so that vaccinating protects others, and that failing to vaccinate endangers others? For the precious few with the courage to question the forced vaccination propaganda, and accept the truth, based on credible, non-CDC science, is no, or, more accurately, absolutely not... It is a brilliant piece of marketing, using guilt to coerce behavior and drive drug sales. It is twisted genius in action, making intelligent, independent-thinking people ignore their honest, well-founded vaccine skepticism, and causing the rest to accept unlimited vaccinations without question."

Why is the 'new' herd immunity illogical?

If someone vaccinates themselves, that immunity is created inside their own body and it cannot be given to others and, therefore it cannot protect others. If "vaccines save lives" then the person who is "protected" by vaccination is "immune" to diseases and to any "threats" from unvaccinated. It is impossible for one person to "boost" another with a vaccine. Supposedly, vaccines are "fuel" for the immune system: if that is true, then vaccines are like food. When I eat food in the US, it does not feed people in other countries... nor do vaccines from others protect me. I submit that vaccines are classic "Double Think" (term popularized by George Orwell in 1984) which is "the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them" as in "vaccines protect me from disease" BUT "for vaccines to protect me, you have to get them too!" Either vaccines protect someone or they do not regardless of what other people do or do not do about vaccination.

What is the purpose of the 'new' herd immunity?

Dr. Russell Blaylock said it best: "...vaccine defenders insist the vaccines (must) have 95% effectiveness rates. Without the mantra of herd immunity, these public-health officials would not be able to justify forced mass vaccinations. [For example], When I was a medical student almost 40 years ago, it was taught that the tetanus vaccine would last a lifetime. Then 30 years after it had been mandated, we discovered that its protection lasted no more than 10 years. Then, I ask my doubting physician if he or she has ever seen a case of tetanus? Most have not. I then tell them to look at the yearly data on tetanus infections – one sees no rise in tetanus cases. The same can be said for measles, mumps, and other childhood infections. It was, and still is, all a myth."

Do vaccinated children have the power to "boost" unvaccinated adults?

In various documentaries online, you constantly hear the phrase "boosting" mentioned. This is not the kind of boosting as in 'you need to keep your vaccines up to date such that new ones take over where old ones have worn off.' This is another form of "Herd Immunity" in which many doctors say that children who are vaccinated are protecting adults whose vaccinations are old-expired-ineffective. I tried to find this online... and it does not appear to exist. Yet while I was searching for this I found a very interesting fact: "Prior to the universal varicella (Chicken Pox) vaccination program, 95% of adults experienced natural chickenpox (usually as school aged children) — these cases were usually benign and resulted in long term immunity. This high percentage of individuals having long term immunity has been compromised by mass vaccination of children which provides at best 70 to 90% immunity that is temporary and of unknown duration — shifting chickenpox to a more vulnerable adult population where chickenpox carries 20 times more risk of death and 15 times more risk of hospitalization compared to children. Add to this the adverse effects of both the chickenpox and shingles vaccines as well as the potential for increased risk of shingles for an estimated 30 to 50 years among adults. The Universal Varicella (Chickenpox) Vaccination Program now requires booster vaccines; however, these are less effective than the natural immunity that existed in communities prior to licensure of the varicella vaccine.

How does 'vaccine hesistancy' support the purpose of the 'new' herd immunity?

"Vaccine hesitancy refers to delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite availability of vaccination services." If you search further down on this World Health Organization page, you will see that one of their solutions to vaccine hesitancy is "Mandating vaccinations / sanctions for non-vaccination."

Why does "one size fits all" vaccination not make sense?

As an old proverb goes, "one size does not fit all because every one is not one size!" Each person is unique: they come in different sizes with different genes and therefore will react differently to any given vaccine. Ask yourself: "Why are vaccines 'one size fits all'? How did we go from 7 shots (24 doses) being 'fully vaxxed' to 50 (69 doses) in ONE generation and not think twice about the effects of all those chemicals and diseases being injected to our children’s newly and still developing bodies, and assume that there cannot possibly be ANY repercussions from this? Why do so many choose to refuse to acknowledge that possibility?" The answer likely to be that "vaccine propaganda" has stopped you from asking these questions.

What is the 10,000 Vaccine Theory?

In the October 2005, Parent's Pack Newsletter from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Dr. Paul Offit stated, "Children have an enormous capacity to respond safely to challenges to the immune system from vaccines. A baby's body is bombarded with immunologic challenges - from bacteria in food to the dust they breathe. Compared to what they typically encounter and manage during the day, vaccines are literally a drop in the ocean... in theory, healthy infants could safely get up to 10,000 vaccines at once." So if the natural immune system is so strong, remind me, why do we need vaccines at all?

Here is a screenshot of this as the original page was taken down.

What is the "Immune Overload Theory"?

The title is: "Study Links Vaccine Induced Immune Overload to Autism, Diabetes, Obesity". The summary is that: "[V]accine-induced immune overload is a driving factor in a number of rapidly accelerating childhood epidemics including: autism, type 1 diabetes, asthma, food allergies, many auto-immune diseases, obesity, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease... (and) metabolic disease." This comes from "[g]iving a child multiple vaccinations for different diseases at the same time increas[ing] the risk of harmful side effects [that] can overload the immune system". This is aggravated by the fact that "[t]here are 'hot lots' of vaccine that have been associated with more adverse events and deaths than others. Parents should find the numbers of these lots and not allow their children to receive vaccines from them."

Why are vaccines still a mystery?

Take the case of the Tuberculosis vaccine, "In various clinical trials the estimates of effectiveness [of the BCG vaccine] have ranged from 80% protection to no benefit, and the reasons for these differences are still not clearly understood." Remind me again why we put so much faith in clinical trials which are at the core of the religion of science? If clinical trials can very so radically, can we trust them so blindly?

How does Group Think show up in the vaccine industry?

If someone expresses an opinion that is not "pro-vaccine all the way", they will find themselves attacked by "pro-vaccine" group think. It works like this:

Illusions of invulnerability lead members of the group to be overly optimistic and engage in risk-taking. Pro-vaxxers will be the first to tell you that vaccines make them invulnerable to illness and suffering. They are so confident that vaccines are 100% safe and effective (despite evidence to the contrary) that they bully others to take them as well.

Unquestioned beliefs lead members to ignore possible moral problems and ignore consequences of individual and group actions. Pro-vaxxers refuse to believe that vaccines cause any damage proclaiming that, for example, "vaccines do not cause autism" when even the US Federal government admits that it does. | US Govt Study #1 | US Govt Study #2 | US Govt Study #3

Rationalizing prevents members from reconsidering their beliefs and causes them to ignore warning signs. Pro-vaxxers will attribute any vaccine damage that they observe in their personal lives to anything other than vaccines. For example, they will believe that babies who were developing normally turn autistic not due to vaccines but due to bad genetics, bad parenting, etc.

Stereotyping leads members of the in-group to ignore or even demonize out-group members who may oppose or challenge the groups ideas. If you are a parent who does not vaccinate their child, you are a child abuser. If you are a coworker who does not vaccinate, then you are not a team player. Applying labels like this creates social pressure to get vaccinated.

Self-censorship causes people who might have doubts to hide their fears or misgivings. Many people live a life of regret for having given their children vaccines which hurt them. My mother often apologized for taking me to get the smallpox and measles vaccines that BOTH nearly cost me my life.

"Mindguards" act as self-appointed censors to hide problematic information from the group. Question the safety or efficacy online and the trolls will come out in force to put you in your place. They will use any means to discredit views those that are anti-vax as well as those that are not pro-vax enough.

Illusions of unanimity lead members to believe that everyone is in agreement and feels the same way. Pro-vaxxers are quick to claim that "every doctor endorses vaccines" when there are many doctors (easily found online) who believe that vaccines are not safe or effective as popular opinion proclaims.

Direct pressure to conform is often placed on members who pose questions, and those who question the group are often seen as disloyal or traitorous. All of the above actions of pro-vaxxers combine to pressure those who refuse to vaccinate. Only you know what is in your best interests: only you can and should decide to vaccinate your children and yourself.

How is the "Four Dog Defense" popularized in the tobacco industry show up in the vaccine industry?

It works like this:

1- "First of all, I don't have a dog" as in "vaccines are good for you!" Vaccines "...are a conspiracy to do good. The goal is to keep immunization rates up so that dreaded diseases don't come back." Kevin Conway, Vaccine Injury Lawyer (from "The Greater Good - Think You Know Everything About Vaccines... Think Again")

2- "And if I had a dog, it doesn't bite" as in "A lot of doctors try to convince their patients that vaccines are 100% safe [and] that parents have nothing at all to worry about. You dont' even need to question the system." Dr. Robert Sears (from "The Greater Good - Think You Know Everything About Vaccines... Think Again")

3- "And if I had a dog and it did bite, then it didn't bite you" as in "That you got a vaccine and that you then developed symptoms doesn't necessarily mean that the vaccine caused the symptoms." Dr. Paul Offit (from "The Greater Good - Think You Know Everything About Vaccines... Think Again")

4- "And if I had a dog and it did bite, and it bit you, then you provoked the dog" as in YOU "are trading the benefit of a life long immunity from normal childhood illnesses for a life long suffering of chronic disease." Robert Mendelsohn MD (from "Silent Epidemic - The Untold Story of Vaccines") Also, "Subjecting millions and millions of women [to an anti-cancer vaccine] to eliminate a few thousand cases of cancer does not really seem justified to me even if it does eliminate these cancers... even if it is effective I wouldn't do it." Scott Ratner MD (from "Silent Epidemic - The Untold Story of Vaccines) After all, if you took a vaccine voluntarily... then - yes - you "provoked" the vaccine dog to bite you.

How is the "Fear Appeal" popularized in advertising show up in the vaccine industry?

It works like this: "A fear appeal is a persuasive message that attempts to arouse fear in order to divert behavior through the threat of impending danger or harm. It presents a risk, presents the vulnerability to the risk, and then may, or may not suggest a form of protective action." Vaccines are sold based on the fear of the "return of dread diseases" and then vaccines are proclaimed as the solution to their return. Why even Paul Offit says so! His words: "I think in many ways that vaccines are the perfect storm of fear."

How do "Obstacles to Knowledge" popularized in philosophy show up in the vaccine industry?

Idols of the Theater: This obstacle to knowledge comes from learning and philosophy that are accepted without question as fact by the majority of the population. As Paul Offit says, "I have a problem with the terms, 'phila' meaning love and 'sophos' meaning wisdom... Where exactly is the wisdom that it makes more sense to not get a vaccine than to get one?" I will answer that: the love is in not giving multiple vaccines to an infant or a child and risk the "potentially life-altering dangers associated with vaccine[s]."

Idols of the Tribe: This obstacle to knowledge is deceptive beliefs which are common to the human race. As Paul Offit says, we "...give vaccines to prevent 14 different diseases in the first few years of life, which can mean as many as 26 inoculations during that time, and as many as five shots at one time, to prevent diseases that most people don’t see — using biological fluids that most people don’t understand." I will answer this: vaccines do not prevent the diseases they claim to prevent as these so-called vaccine preventable diseases keep breaking out in highly vaccinated populations!

Idols of the Marketplace: This obstacle to knowledge comes from the very deceptive use of communication. As Paul Offit says, "If religion teaches us anything, it is to care about our children, our families and our communities. A choice to put a child in harm’s way, to allow them to catch and potentially transmit a fatal infection, is a profoundly non-religious thing to do — and therefore shouldn't be given the legal protections of religion." I will answer this: giving a child a vaccine that causes them to spread contagion ("shedding") and that is full of toxic poisons ("adjuvants") is not only contrary to religion but, in my view, should be prosecuted as a criminal act.

Idols of the Cave: This obstacle to knowledge arises within the mind of the individual. As Paul Offit says, "Vaccines are not a belief system, they are an evidence-based system. Vaccines stand on a mountain of evidence — you don’t have to believe in vaccines any more than you have to believe in gravity or evolution." I will answer this: That mountain of evidence is actually a house of cards built on intentionally twisted history as this page details. Not to worry: reincarnation works whether you believe in it or not and Paul Offit is destined to be vaxxed to the max... and he will reap what he has sown.

Why is the phenomenon of "disease die off" always ignored in the case of vaccinations?

Take the famous case of the firebombing of Cotton Mather. The note attached to the bomb survived and read "Mather, you dog, damn you, I'll inoculate you with this." Mather's ally, Zabdiel Boylston (who was also pro-vaccine), collected data showing that smallpox died down after there was an effort to inoculate those in Boston. YET by the time those inoculations were made, the disease was dying off. Diseases are like a wave: they start, they peak, and they die off. So was the reduced death rate due to vaccines or to disease die off? Here is where pro-vaxers are certain it is always vaccines.

Why have there always been anti-vaccine protesters from the time of Jenner?

"The anti-vaccination movement has been around nearly as long as the usage of vaccinations." "Vaccination acts passed between 1840 and 1853 made vaccination compulsory in Britain, and almost immediately anti-vaccination leagues challenged the law as a violation of civil liberty... Anti-vaccination groups have continued into the 21st century and are highly visible on the internet, presenting arguments remarkably similar to those of the 19th century." Why is this? Why are other scientific advances eventually accepted BUT NEVER vaccines? Could it be that as each generation is damaged by vaccination, people rise up against it? You decide.

Is there evidence as to the health of children who are vaccinated versus unvaccinated?

Both sides of the vaccine debate say the same thing: there needs to be a "vaxxed versus unvaxxed study!" Vaccination records are kept as are statistics for populations who chose not to vaccinate for religious reasons like Amish people. Informal research exists showing that Amish people who are unvaccinated rarely get autism, cancer, or heart disease. Formal research exists showing that compared to unvaccinated children, vaccinated children had higher odds of developing: chronic illness (2.4 times higher), eczema (2.9 times higher), neurodevelopmental disorder (3.7 times higher), autism (4.2 times higher), adhd (4.2 times higher), learning disabilities (5.2 times higher), and allergic rhinitis (30.1 times higher). So you decide which is better vaxxed versus unvaxxed? As always, the choice is yours!

Why must there be intellectual dishonesty in the promotion of vaccines?

In the "Annual Summary of Vital Statistics: Trends in the Health of Americans During the 20th Century" by Bernard Guyer, Mary Anne Freedman, Donna M. Strombino, and Edward J Sondik, December 2000 from Pediatrics: Official Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, this sentence used to be included in the article: "Thus vaccination does not account for the impressive declines in mortality seen in the first half of the century." NOW THAT PHRASE HAS BEEN REMOVED. While I have begun researching links to information that is not pro-vaccine, I found that several links have simply disappeared over time.

How does herd mentality play a role in the vaccine industry?

Jerome Groopman in his book, "How Doctors Think", notes the "culture of conformity and orthodoxy that begins in medical school" (p. 153). Dr. Russell Blaylock expands on this: "Even if they are not fans of vaccines, many doctors give vaccines out of fear. They do not want to question authority or challenge professional organizations and licensing bodies, such as state medical boards, the very organizations that develop and enforce vaccines mandates. From the very beginning of medical education, bright, aspiring medical students, interns and residents are taught to do as they are told, follow orders and not confront the status quo. Doctors-in-training who challenge the system or dare to think independently are often punished with more work or publicly humiliated in front of their peers. Early on, they get the message they better tow the Party Line if they want to survive. Later, when in their individual practices, doctors who buck the system and don't vaccinate, or vaccinate less aggressively, often suffer penalties such as losing hospital privileges, being dropped from insurance company rosters or being ostracized by their peers."

It is this conformity, orthodoxy, and social pressure that creates a herd mentality among doctors. This, in the past, has lead to the following horrific medical failures. The same herd mentality that is still at work with vaccines.

SMOKING: Tobacco was introduced into England by Sir John Hawkins in 1565. In 1604, King James I of England wrote "A Counterblaste to Tobacco" where he said that smoking was a "custom loathsome to the eye, hatefull to the Nose, harmefull to the braine, dangerous to the Lungs..." Flash forward to the 20th century where doctor endorsed cigarettes touting their health benefits right up until The Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act of 1965 (Public Law 89–92) required that the warning 'Caution: Cigarette Smoking May Be Hazardous to Your Health' be placed in small print on one of the side panels of each cigarette package."

CALOMEL (MERCURY): This account by President John Adams is the best way to understand WHY Mercury was so horrifying as a medical treatment: "in the Winter of 1764, the Small Pox prevailing in Boston, I... was inocculated under the Direction of Dr. Nathaniel Perkins and Dr. Joseph Warren. This Distemper was very terrible even by Inocculation at that time. My Physicians dreaded it, and prepared me, by a milk Diet and a Course of Mercurial Preparations, till they reduced me very low before they performed the operation. They continued to feed me with Milk and Mercury through the whole Course of it, and salivated me to such a degree, that every tooth in my head became so loose that I believe I could have pulled them all with my Thumb and finger. By such means they conquered the Small Pox, which I had very lightly, but they rendered me incapable... of speaking or eating in my old Age." Think mercury in vaccines is at all safe, even in very small doses?

PATENT MEDICINE: "The era of patent medicine — which stretched from the 17th into the 20th century and was especially prolific in the United States and England — was a response to the shortcomings of medicine at the time, which often relied on questionable treatments like bloodletting and purging." Yet doctors approved of such patent "medicines" as opium, blood, cocaine, cannabis, and arsenic. Human blood is still present in vaccines.

RADIATION: "Early in the 20th century there was a medical practice that revolved around a new treatment involving the radioactive material called radium... By the 1940s and 50s, however, the practice of using radium as a medical treatment had been reduced to very few applications due to its high price, small quantity, and the dangers of handling radium... like disease, disfigurement, and death.

THALIDOMIDE: "Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey... asked the manufacturer (of Thalidomide), the William S. Merrell Company of Cincinnati, for more (information about Thalidomide)... by late 1961, the terrible evidence was pouring in. The drug — better known by its generic name, thalidomide — was causing thousands of babies in Europe, Britain, Canada and the Middle East to be born with flipper-like arms and legs and other defects.

DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane): "DDT Is Good For Me-e-e!" was the advertizing slogan which many people believed, including physicians. "In the 1940s and ’50s dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, a synthetic pesticide better known as DDT, was used to kill bugs that spread malaria and typhus in several parts of the world. DDT was argued to be toxic to humans and the environment in the famous environmental [work], 'Silent Spring'. It was banned by the U.S. government in 1972."
When DDT usage increased, cases of polio increased... and when it usage decreased, cases of polio decreased. click here to see the graph.

What is vaccine fanaticism?

At first, I did not believe that there was such a thing as "vaccine fanaticism" but I encountered it so many times why preparing these pages, that I include it here as a form of vaccine propaganda. Vaccine Fanaticism... is characterized by an unwavering devotion to vaccines without any thought to the very real risks and dangers caused by vaccines. Vaccine fanatics deny that any risks exist and declare that those who even question the efficacy and safety of vaccines are the dangerous ones to society. Many vaccine fanatics believe that those who question or oppose vaccines should be punished, even to the extent of rounding them up and jailing them. Their solution is to forcefully vaccinate children against the wishes of the parents, all in the name of the 'greater good of society'. Despite what the American Medical Association has said in its own ethical code about mandatory vaccines, vaccine fanatics believe that forcing vaccines on others is the only solution. The AMA is very clear about patients having the right to determine their own course of treatments. Their ethical code clearly states "Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor." Despite the fact that the AMA is against forcing vaccines and treatments upon patients, vaccine fanatics believe that no one has the right to make that decision for themselves and for their child; they believe that everyone should be vaccinated, by force if necessary. In their efforts to force their beliefs on those around them, vaccine fanatics will go to great lengths to try to convince others, and to demonize anyone who doesn’t share their point of view. This kind of zealous ideal used to be reserved for matters of religion.

Credits: Various as noted



& Search

Site MAP

Mega Index
of Keywords

Ezine Index

Past Life

Higher Self

All About Us











Past Life




Cure Diabetes

Cure Stress

Cure Depression

Lose Weight

Healing Guide

Secrets of
Soulmate Love

Create Luck
& Money

eBook Affiliate
Mktg Toolbox


Our Healing

Our Order

Healing Tool


Contact Us

Email Us

Instant Info


Thanks for...


Home | Instant Info | Past Life Profile | Catalog | Email

Our Services  Terms of Service  Coaching Agreement  Earnings-Income Disclaimer 
Health-Medical Disclaimer  Affiliate Disclaimer  Copyrights-Trademarks Notice 
Privacy Notice  GDPR  Refund Policy  FTC Compliance Notice  Anti-Spam Policy 
DMCA Compliance Notice  Social Media Disclosure  Website Accessibility Policy
Report Abuse

Web Site Hosted by Net Atlantic

by New Age Web Marketing

Copyright © 2000-2023, Ellen A Mogensen, Past & Now Forward Holistic Counseling,
532 Old Marlton Pike #248, Fun Life Company LLC, Marlton, NJ 08053 USA (856) 988-9716
Past Forward(TM) & Now Forward(TM) are trademarks of The Fun Life Company.
All rights reserved. heal past lives, karma, reincarnation